L.A. Residents Take Crosswalk Safety Into Their Own Hands

California law protects pedestrians in both marked and unmarked crosswalks

In California, pedestrians in both marked and unmarked crosswalks have the same legal protections. Even without painted lines, a crosswalk legally exists at most intersections, and drivers are required to yield to walkers. When a pedestrian is struck, the absence of visible paint does nothing to erase that responsibility. This fact becomes central in many cases handled by an experienced California pedestrian accident lawyer.

That point has new urgency in Los Angeles, where safety improvements can take months or even years to materialize. In Sawtelle, frustrated residents recently took matters into their own hands, painting crosswalks near Stoner Park to slow traffic and protect pedestrians. Their decision to bypass the city’s drawn-out approval process may have improved visibility overnight, but it also highlights a deeper problem: inadequate infrastructure leaves pedestrians vulnerable, and when accidents happen, securing justice can be far from straightforward.

Liability for Drivers in Pedestrian Accidents

California law is clear: Motorists must yield to pedestrians in marked crosswalks and at intersections with unmarked crosswalks. Failure to do so can form the basis for a personal injury or wrongful death claim. In recent years, Los Angeles juries and insurance settlements have awarded significant compensation to injured pedestrians and their families, including multi-million-dollar verdicts in cases involving high-speed impacts and drivers' disregard for right-of-way rules.

Yet, proving fault in these cases often goes beyond simply pointing to a painted or unpainted crossing. Attorneys must show that the driver failed to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances. This can be especially important in areas where inadequate signage, poor lighting, or missing traffic control measures contributed to the crash.

How Legal Teams Build Strong Pedestrian Accident Cases

In pedestrian injury litigation, success depends on gathering and presenting compelling evidence that leaves little room for doubt. This is particularly vital in locations where visibility issues or substandard infrastructure exist, as is often the case in Los Angeles neighborhoods with high pedestrian activity.

Key strategies in these cases often include:

• Accident Reconstruction: Specialists analyze vehicle speed, braking distance, and impact points to show the driver’s failure to yield or slow down.
• Video and Witness Evidence: Surveillance footage and eyewitness testimony can be crucial in confirming that the pedestrian had the right of way.
• Expert Testimony on Roadway Design: Traffic engineering experts may testify that inadequate crosswalk visibility or a lack of safety features increased the likelihood of a collision.
• Driver Distraction Analysis: Phone records and in-vehicle data can establish whether the driver was texting or otherwise inattentive at the time of the crash.

By using these methods, attorneys can counter common defense arguments, such as claims that the pedestrian “darted out” or wasn’t in a proper crossing, and focus the case on the driver’s legal duty to be alert and yield. When a skilled lawyer handles this process, it strengthens the injured person’s position and increases the likelihood of full compensation.

The Role of Infrastructure in Liability

The Stoner Park crosswalk project highlights an important truth: infrastructure influences both driver behavior and legal arguments. Studies consistently show that visible, well-marked crosswalks and traffic calming measures reduce the incidence of pedestrian accidents. However, under California law, drivers cannot use the absence of those features as an excuse.

In fact, in some cases, unsafe roadway design may allow injured pedestrians to bring claims against the city or other entities responsible for street maintenance. These claims are subject to very short deadlines, often as little as six months, to file a notice of intent. That’s why understanding the full scope of liability, including municipal responsibility, can be critical to maximizing recovery.

Justice Beyond the Paint

Whether a crosswalk is newly painted by the city, unofficially stenciled by residents, or invisible to the eye, the law places the duty squarely on drivers to yield to pedestrians. When they fail and a pedestrian is hurt, accountability matters, not just for the injured person, but for the safety of the entire community.

In Los Angeles and the San Fernando Valley, pedestrian accidents often lead to life-altering injuries such as traumatic brain damage, spinal cord injuries, and multiple fractures. The cost of medical treatment, rehabilitation, and lost income can be overwhelming. Victims deserve representation that can hold negligent drivers accountable, challenge inadequate infrastructure, and secure the compensation necessary for a full recovery.

Oaks Law Firm has a record of success in these complex cases, including a $5.3 million settlement for a pedestrian who lost a leg after being struck, and $1 million for a worker who suffered serious facial injuries when a truck backed into him during a job site lunch break. These case results reflect our ability to hold negligent drivers accountable and fight for the compensation victims deserve.

If you or a loved one has been seriously injured in a pedestrian accident, time is not on your side. Legal deadlines apply, and crucial evidence can disappear quickly. Contact Oaks Law Firm for a free consultation to understand your rights, preserve your claim, and take the first step toward justice.

Why Us? Because We Listen!™

"If you are seeking a law firm that combines unparalleled legal skill with heartfelt client care and unwavering commitment, Oaks Law Firm is the clear choice. Their professionalism, dedication, and personalized approach are unmatched. I wish I could give them not just five stars, but a thousand, for the extraordinary support and outstanding results they delivered. They went above and beyond to ensure that my voice was heard and that I received the justice I deserved." - Anonymous, ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐